Edit by moderator:
Drob, can you please argument your point of view and not just laugh at people nor insult them.
Search found 5 matches
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:55 pm
- Forum: Chinese Mahjong
- Topic: Combinatorics Table Posted
- Replies: 11
- Views: 13557
- Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:37 pm
- Forum: Reach Mahjong
- Topic: Furiten question
- Replies: 47
- Views: 46334
Re:Furiten question
yay~
- Wed Dec 02, 2009 1:46 am
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: EMA vs Swiss/Buchholz system
- Replies: 11
- Views: 13085
Re:EMA vs Swiss/Buchholz system
Tip to newcomers: read ==> this <== and ==> that <== . One thing bother me in your table-point system, and it\'s not ties. To take your example: Imagine 2 tables, table A and B. On table A plays 1 good player (player A1), and three bad players. On table B plays 4 good players. [...] Now, after the ...
- Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:43 pm
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: EMA vs Swiss/Buchholz system
- Replies: 11
- Views: 13085
EMA vs Swiss/Buchholz system
Is a change possible now though? On an individual level, a system change like this would effect how player’s approach tournaments. On the level of the EMA, would they have to discard the EMA ranking system scores that have been collected up until now to start this new system? Of course they don\'t ...
- Sun Nov 15, 2009 8:53 am
- Forum: Reach Mahjong
- Topic: Dead Wall Question
- Replies: 13
- Views: 9998
Re:Pseudo-random number generator
>Expect manually throwing a new casino dice, or looking at some quantic atom properties, there is not many real-random events.
Atmospheric noise, shot noise, thermal noise, electronic noise and radioactive decay comes to mind quite readily.
Atmospheric noise, shot noise, thermal noise, electronic noise and radioactive decay comes to mind quite readily.